The Sample Size Illusion: Why More Synthetic Data Isn’t More Information
- February 11, 2026
- Posted by: StatGenius
- Category: Competitive research
When you are vetting research vendors, you will often see them flaunt massive sample sizes. They promise thousands of synthetic respondents delivered in minutes. It is tempting to think that N=5,000 synthetic “people” gives you more statistical power than a few hundred human ones. In reality, it doesn’t. More rows of synthetic data do not equal more information.
One Model, One Logic
In traditional research, every human respondent is an independent data source. They have different life experiences, unique biases, and unpredictable moods. When you add more people, you are adding new, independent pieces of information to your study.
Synthetic data works differently. Every single “respondent” in an AI panel shares the same underlying model logic. When a vendor runs a model 5,000 times with slight variations, they aren’t interviewing 5,000 individuals. They are asking a single algorithm the same question 5,000 times. You aren’t gaining a broader perspective; you are just watching a single perspective repeat itself. The statistical power is a total illusion.
A Veneer of Insight
Synthetic panels are appealing because they hit the “big three” of project management: they are fast, they are scalable, and they are cheap. But those promises come with a catch. They provide a veneer of insight without any of the substance.
If you try to perform deep-dive cross-tabs or complex forecasting on this data, you are essentially analyzing a hall of mirrors. Real market understanding only comes from measuring real people who have skin in the game. Real respondents can surprise you, change their minds, or act “irrationally” in ways an algorithm cannot predict.
Use it, Don’t Rely on it
This doesn’t mean synthetic tools are useless. They can be helpful in very limited, exploratory contexts, like checking the phrasing of a survey question or brainstorming potential category triggers. But as a professional researcher, you cannot let them replace human data. To provide insights that actually move the needle for your company, you need evidence that is measured and observed, not just generated.